A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between potential neighbours in excess of the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a situation that has captivated nationwide awareness following an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental considerations, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations posting about René Collier plus the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as an area disagreement has developed right into a hugely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building is effective at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, seek to develop their family dwelling. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of set up citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming built by their possible neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted underneath organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two inhabitants of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their setting up authorization by building a wall past the boundaries of their website, resulting in an encroachment on the Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as such spots are subject matter to rigid controls beneath European and Irish environmental legislation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, particularly inside a sensitive coastal environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their scheduling permission, and say the wall, and that is partially developed, is in the proper place. Their lawful group has characterised the motion as an try and delay or frustrate a lawful development. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in order to protect their see, an allegation which has been recurring in court and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal setting up disputes, the place views of the sea are the two highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable endeavours through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the site, As outlined by sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which includes since develop into emblematic with the intensity on the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they were meant to Acquire Visible proof in the wall’s place relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions reported, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the drinking water in the course of critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm drinking water to photograph the website turned one of the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of steps have been cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were included in detail via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the qualifications and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court heard even more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders need to be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital moment within the authorized timeline.
With the Main of your dispute is often a disagreement in excess of boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as made, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been described as meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and problems attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally pressured that their motion is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting alternatively that it is about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have got described their very long-standing link to Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 the area and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few simply just attempting to produce a relatives property in accordance Using the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches over a Specific Spot of Conservation and say that all works have already been carried out according to Skilled tips and accepted programs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like getting into The ocean during a storm, do not change the underlying details.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how scheduling disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute over construction of wall at coastal web site happens to be a shorthand description for a circumstance that lots of observers see as ever more popular. As sea levels rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation between private land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier pointed out which the businessman experienced previously been involved with area advocacy on setting up and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from pretty diverse professional backgrounds can find themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-high drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations and René Collier waded by way of waist-higher water through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting each the Actual physical actuality from the coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an extreme technique.
As the High Court proceedings go on, the outcome stays uncertain. The court ought to figure out whether or not the wall as crafted complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Unique Location of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and scheduling situations. But the human component stays central: neighbours who have to Are living along with each other extended following the authorized prices happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building operates at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase further than that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. In addition it underscores how promptly an area disagreement can escalate when essential challenges including environmental security and house legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. Whether or not it can finally be altered, taken off, or done as planned will depend on the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will likely carry on to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.